Abdominal Panniculectomy: Determining the Impact of Diabetes on Adverse Outcomes and Complications.

Background: Despite its association with obesity, the relation between diabetes and the abdominal panniculectomy is less well-established. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the result of diabetes on post-panniculectomy complications in a large cohort and to establish the risk factors associated with unfavorable post-operative outcomes. Methods: Patients that underwent a panniculectomy between 2010 and 2018 were identified in PearlDiver, a national insurance claims database, and identified by Current Procedural Terminology code 15380. Patient demographics and comorbidities were elucidated, and various complications were then identified. Descriptive statistics as well as a multivariate analysis were used to evaluate the association of risk factors and complications. Results: A total of 8282 panniculectomy patients were identified-4245 with diabetes, 4037 without. Obesity, tobacco use, and diabetes were all identified as significant risk factors in developing a surgical site infection, wound disruption, as well as needing to undergo reoperation. Diabetic panniculectomy patients had a higher rate of readmission as well as reoperation and sustained a higher rate of surgical complications, even when matched for. Conclusion: Diabetic panniculectomy patients are at a greater risk for developing complications. Identifying potential risk factors in this patient population could help reduce post-operative complications following a panniculectomy.

Contexte: En dépit de son association avec l'obésité, la relation existant entre le diabète et la panniculectomie abdominale est moins bien établie. Cette étude avait pour objectif d'évaluer le résultat du diabète sur les complications post-panniculectomie dans une vaste cohorte et de déterminer les facteurs de risque associés aux évolutions postopératoires défavorables. Méthodes: Des patients ayant subi une panniculectomie entre 2010 et 2018 ont été identifiés dans la base de données PearlDiver, une base de données nationale de réclamations de remboursement d'assurances, et identifiés par le code CPT 15380. Les données démographiques et les comorbidités des patients ont été élucidées et différentes complications ont alors été identifiées. Des statistiques descriptives ainsi qu'une analyse multifactorielle ont permis d'évaluer l'association des facteurs de risque et des complications. Résultats: 8 282 patients ayant subi une panniculectomie ont été identifiés, parmi lesquels 4 245 avaient un diabète et 4 037 n'en avaient pas. L'obésité, le tabagisme et le diabète ont tous été identifiés comme étant des facteurs de risque significatifs pour le développement d'une infection du site opératoire, une perturbation de la plaie, ainsi que le besoin d'une réintervention. Les patients diabétiques ayant subi une panniculectomie ont eu des taux de réadmission et de réintervention plus élevés; leur taux de complications chirurgicales a été plus important, même après appariement. Conclusion: Les patients subissant une panniculectomie ont un risque plus élevé de complications postopératoires. L'identification des facteurs de risque potentiels dans cette population de patients pourrait contribuer à réduire les complications postopératoires après panniculectomie.

The Cost of Ambulatory Breast Reduction: Hospital Reimbursement Versus Surgeon Payments.

Introduction: Reduction mammoplasty (RM) is one of the most common operations performed in plastic surgery. While US national surgical expenditures have risen in recent years, studies have reported decreasing reimbursement rates for plastic surgeons. The purpose of this study is to characterize the trends in charges and payments for a common plastic surgery operation, ambulatory RM, for facilities and physicians. Methods: A Medicare patient records database was used to capture hospital, surgeon, and anesthesiologist charges and payments for ambulatory RM from 2005 to 2014. Values were adjusted for inflation. A ratio of hospital to surgeon charges and payments were calculated: charge multiplier (CM) and payment multiplier (PM), respectively. Charges, payments, Charlson comorbidity index, CM, and PM values were analyzed for trends. Results: This study included 1001 patients. During the study period, the facility charge for RM per patient increased from $8477 to $11,102 (31% increase; p < .0005), and the surgeon charge increased from $7088 to $7199 (2% increase; p = .0009). Facility payments increased from $3661 to $3930 (7% increase; p < .0005), and surgeon payments decreased from $1178 to $1002 (15% decrease; p < .0005). CM increased from 1.2 to 1.54, and PM increased from 3.11 to 3.92. Conclusions: Charges and payments to facilities for ambulatory RM increased disproportionately to that of surgeons, likely due in part to rising administrative costs in health care delivery. This may disincentivize plastic surgeons from offering RM at hospital-based surgical centers, limiting patient access to this operation.

Introduction: La mammoplastie de réduction (MR) est l'une des interventions les plus courantes pratiquées en chirurgie plastique. Alors que les dépenses chirurgicales aux États-Unis ont augmenté au niveau national au cours des dernières années, les études ont signalé une diminution des taux de remboursement pour les chirurgiens plasticiens. L'objectif de cette étude est de définir les tendances dans les frais et paiements pour une intervention courante de chirurgie plastique, une MR ambulatoire, pour les établissements et pour les médecins. Méthodes: Une base de données des dossiers de patients Medicare a été utilisée pour collecter les frais pour les hôpitaux, les chirurgiens et les anesthésiologistes ainsi que les paiements pour MR ambulatoires de 2005 à 2014. Les valeurs ont été ajustées pour tenir compte de l'inflation. Des ratios des frais hôpital/chirurgien et des paiements ont été calculés : respectivement, un facteur de multiplication des frais (MF) et des paiements (MP). Les tendances de la valeur des frais, des paiements, de l'indice de comorbidité de Charlson, du MF et du MP ont été analysées. Résultats: Cette étude a inclus 1001 patients. Au cours de la période de l'étude, les frais pour MR par patient à la charge de l'établissement ont augmenté de 8 477 $ à 11 102 $, soit une augmentation de 31 % (P < 0,0005) et les frais du chirurgien sont passés de 7 088 $ à 7 199 $, soit une augmentation de 2 % (P = 0,0009). Les paiements de l'établissement ont augmenté de 3 661 $ à 3 930 $, soit une augmentation de 7 % (P < 0,0005) et les paiements du chirurgien ont diminué de 1 178 $ à 1 002 $, soit une diminution de 15 % (P < 0,0005). Le facteur MF est passé de 1,2 à 1,54 et le facteur MP est passé de 3,11 à 3,92. Conclusions: Les frais et paiements aux établissements pour MR ambulatoire ont augmenté de manière disproportionnée par rapport à ceux des chirurgiens, probablement en partie à cause de l'augmentation des coûts administratifs croissants de l'administration des soins. Cela pourrait inciter les chirurgiens plasticiens à ne plus offrir de MR dans les centres chirurgicaux hospitaliers et pourrait donc limiter l'accès des patients à cette opération.

Determinants of pressure injury development in patients with COVID-19.

OBJECTIVE: Pressure injuries (PIs) often develop in critically ill patients due to immobility, and underlying comorbidities that decrease tissue perfusion and wound healing capacity. This study sought to provide epidemiological data on determinants and current managements practices of PI in patients with COVID-19. METHOD: A US national insurance-based database consisting of patients with coronavirus or COVID-19 diagnoses was used for data collection. Patients were filtered by International Classification of Diseases (ICD) codes corresponding to coronavirus or COVID-19 diagnosis between 2019-2020. Diagnosis of PI following COVID-19 diagnosis was queried. Demographic data and comorbidity information was compared. Logistic regression analysis was used to determine predictors for both PI development and likelihood of operative debridement. RESULTS: A total of 1,477,851 patients with COVID-19 were identified. Of these, 15,613 (1.06%) subsequently developed a PI, and 8074 (51.7%) of these patients had an intensive care unit (ICU) admission. The average and median time between diagnosis of COVID-19 and PI was 39.4 and 26 days, respectively. PI was more likely to occur in patients with COVID-19 with: diabetes (odds ratio (OR): 1.39, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.29-1.49; p<0.001); coronary artery disease (OR: 1.11, 95% CI: 1.04-1.18, p=0.002), hypertension (OR: 1.43, 95% CI: 1.26-1.64; p<0.001); chronic kidney disease (OR: 1.18, 95% CI: 1.10-1.26; p<0.001); depression (OR: 1.45, 95% CI 1.36-1.54; p<0.001); and long-term non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug use (OR: 1.21, 95% CI: 1.05-1.40; p=0.007). They were also more likely in critically ill patients admitted to the ICU (OR: 1.40, 95% CI: 1.31-1.48; p<0.001); and patients requiring vasopressors (OR:1.25, 95% CI: 1.13-1.38; p<0.001), intubation (OR: 1.21, 95% CI 1.07-1.39; p=0.004), or with a diagnosis of sepsis (OR: 2.38, 95% CI 2.22-2.55; p<0.001). ICU admission, sepsis, buttock and lower back PI along with increasing Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) (OR: 1.04, 95% CI 1.00-1.08; p=0.043) was associated with surgical debridement. The vast majority of patients with COVID-19 did not undergo operative debridement or wound coverage. CONCLUSION: PIs are widely prevalent in patients with COVID-19, especially in those who are critically ill, yet the vast majority do not undergo operative procedures. DECLARATION OF INTEREST: The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Case-matched Comparison of Implant-based Breast Reconstruction with and without Acellular Dermal Matrix.

Background: Acellular dermal matrix (ADM) is commonly used in implant-based breast reconstruction due to improved soft-tissue support and control of the implant pocket and decreased capsular contracture. However, concerns about complications have prompted the FDA to request more clinical data. This large-scale study aims to examine perioperative outcomes of ADM use in breast reconstruction. Methods: This study utilized a national insurance-based database to identify patients who underwent mastectomy between 2011 and 2019, with and without ADM. The groups were matched for age, region, and comorbidities. Complications within 90 days were compared using univariate and multivariate analyses. Results: A total of 49,366 patients were identified with 26,266 patients in the ADM group and 23,100 in the non-ADM group. Infection rates (4.7% ADM versus 4.4% no ADM) and seroma rates (3.9% ADM versus 4% no ADM) were similar. However, the ADM group had a 1% higher rate of implant removal (4.9% ADM versus 3.9% no ADM, P < 0.001). In direct-to-implant procedures, ADM use was associated with higher explantation rates (8.2% versus 6.3%, P = 0.002). Multivariate analysis identified tobacco use, hypertension, depression, obesity, ADM usage, and direct-to-implant surgery as risk factors for implant removal. Conclusions: This study found comparable infection and seroma rates in implant-based breast reconstruction with and without ADM. ADM use was associated with a 1% higher risk of implant removal, with risk factors including tobacco use, obesity, hypertension, depression, and direct-to-implant procedures. Multicenter studies and registry data on prepectoral breast reconstruction are warranted to help interpret these findings.

Gender-Affirming Surgery Improves Mental Health Outcomes and Decreases Anti-Depressant Use in Patients with Gender Dysphoria.

BACKGROUND: Patients with gender dysphoria face significant health disparities and barriers to care. Transition-related care includes hormonal therapy, mental healthcare, and gender-affirming surgeries. Studies have described favorable surgical outcomes and patient satisfaction, however, the degree to which these procedures impact mental health conditions is not fully understood. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of gender-affirming plastic surgery on mental health and substance abuse in the transgender population. METHODS: A national insurance claims-based database was used for data collection. Patients with a diagnosis of gender dysphoria were propensity score-matched for the likelihood of undergoing gender-affirming surgery (no surgery being the control cohort), based on comorbidities, age, and sex. Primary outcomes included post-operative antidepressant use and the prevalence of mental health conditions. RESULTS: A total of 3,134 patients with gender dysphoria were included in each cohort. Patients in the surgery group had overall lower rates of mental health conditions, substance abuse, and SSRI/SNRI use. There was an absolute decrease of 8.8% in SSRI or SNRI prescription after gender-affirming plastic surgery (p<0.001), and significant decreases in post-operative depression (7.7%), anxiety (1.6%), suicidal ideation (5.2%) and attempts (2.3%), alcohol abuse (2.1%), and drug abuse (1.9%). CONCLUSION: Gender-affirming surgery in appropriately selected gender dysphoric patients is associated with decreased postoperative rates of SSRI or SNRI use and improved mental health.

Effectiveness of Liposomal Bupivacaine Transversus Abdominis Plane Block in DIEP Flap Breast Reconstruction: Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: Transversus Abdominis Plane (TAP) blocks improve pain control and reduce narcotic medication requirements in various surgical procedures. Liposomal bupivacaine may provide more sustained analgesia. This study compares pain related outcomes between standard bupivacaine and liposomal bupivacaine TAP blocks after autologous breast reconstruction. METHODS: Prospective single-center, single-blinded, randomized controlled trial between March 2021 and December 2022. DIEP flap breast reconstruction patients in a standardized Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) pathway were randomized to receive intraoperative TAPs with either bupivacaine / epinephrine (control) or liposomal bupivacaine / bupivacaine / epinephrine (experimental). Primary outcome was postoperative narcotic medication requirements, with secondary outcomes of pain scores, length of stay (LOS), and narcotic medication refills. RESULTS: 117 patients met inclusion criteria (59 control, 58 experimental). Patient demographics, comorbidities, breast pathologic variables, surgery laterality and immediate versus delayed reconstruction status were equivalent between groups. Control group had significantly higher average pain scores postoperatively (4.3 vs. 3.6, p=0.004). However, there were no significant differences in mean narcotic use (66.9 MME vs 60.2 MME, p=0.47). Both LOS and postoperative narcotic prescription refills were equivalent between groups (2.1 vs 2.2 days, p = 0.55, 22% vs 17.2%, p=0.52). CONCLUSION: Addition of liposomal bupivacaine to standard bupivacaine TAP block mixture in a standardized ERAS protocol did not demonstrate a significant reduction in postoperative narcotic requirements after DIEP flap breast reconstruction compared to standard bupivacaine alone. Patient-reported pain scores, however, were lower among liposomal bupivacaine patients after the initial 24 hours postoperatively and consistent with a longer duration of analgesia.

Oncoplastic breast reduction surgery decreases rates of reoperation with no increased medical risk.

The purpose of this study is to compare the oncologic, medical, and surgical outcomes of lumpectomy versus oncoplastic breast reduction surgery (OBRS) on a national scale. A national insurance-based database was queried for patients who had a lumpectomy with or without a same-day breast reduction by Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes. Patients were then matched by obesity, body mass index range, age, region, neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and outcomes were compared. There were 421,455 patients in the lumpectomy group and 15,909 patients in the OBRS group. After matching, 15,134 patients were identified in each group. Repeat lumpectomy or subsequent mastectomy was more common in the lumpectomy group (15.2% vs. 12.2%, p < 0.001). OBRS patients had higher rates of 90-day surgical complications including dehiscence, infection, fat necrosis, breast abscesses, and antibiotic prescription (p < 0.001). Meanwhile, any medical complication was less common in the OBRS group (3.7% vs. 4.5%, p = 0.001). Logistic regression revealed that OBRS was associated with decreased odds of repeat lumpectomy (OR = 0.71, 95% CI 0.66-0.77, p < 0.001) with no significant increased odds of subsequent mastectomy (OR = 1.01, 95% CI 0.91-1.11, p = 0.914). OBRS was found to be associated with decreased risk for reoperation in the form of lumpectomy without increased likelihood of subsequent mastectomy. Although OBRS was associated with increased wound complications, medical complications were found to occur less frequently. This study endorses increased consideration of OBRS when lumpectomy or OBRS is appropriate.

Optimizing perioperative outcomes in autologous breast reconstruction.

Perioperative optimization in surgery is paramount to the success of an operation. This especially applies to autologous breast reconstruction where small details can make the difference between success and failure. In this article, the authors discuss a wide array of aspects of perioperative care in autologous reconstruction and best practices. Stratification of surgical candidates, including types of autologous breast reconstruction are discussed. The informed consent process, including benefits, alternatives, and risks specific to autologous breast reconstruction is delineated. The importance of operative efficiency and benefits of pre-operative imaging are discussed. The importance and benefits of patient education is examined. Also examined at length are pre-habilitation and its effects on patient recovery, antibiotic prophylaxis including duration and organism coverage, venous thromboembolism risk stratification and prophylaxis, anesthetic and analgesic interventions including multiple types of regional blocks are broken down. Flap monitoring methods and the importance of clinical exam are emphasized, and the potential risks of blood transfusion in free flap patients are examined. Post-operative interventions and determining readiness for discharge are also reviewed. The review of these components of perioperative care allows the reader to gain comprehensive insight into autologous breast reconstruction best practices and the important role perioperative care plays in this patient population.

Is Nitropaste Effective in Stressed Flaps?

ABSTRACT: Topical nitroglycerine (nitropaste) is an agent that has seen popularization in plastic surgery in recent years. A low-cost medication functioning, by inducing vasodilation primarily in the venous system and inhibiting platelet aggregation, has shown the ability to provide benefits in clinically concerning skin flaps. In random-pattern skin flaps, research shows that topical nitroglycerine decreases flap loss and increases the percentage of viable tissue. In mastectomy skin flaps, there have been multiple studies showing significant decreases in flap necrosis and need for debridement in patients undergoing topical nitroglycerine application without changes in complications profiles. These studies have included patients undergoing and not undergoing implant-based breast reconstruction. There are no data examining myocutaneous or perforator flaps. In free flaps, there is research showing benefit of nitroglycerine in breaking vasospasm and inducing vasodilation in microsurgery. Overall, topical nitroglycerine is a proven entity effective at increasing viable tissue in random-pattern skin flaps and shows clear benefits in the reduction of mastectomy skin flap necrosis with minimal adverse effects or additional cost. Further research is needed into other areas of plastic surgery where it may be of value.

Microvascular free tissue transfer for reconstruction of complex lower extremity trauma: Predictors of complications and flap failure.

BACKGROUND: Despite advanced wound care techniques, open fractures in the setting of lower extremity trauma remain a challenging pathology, particularly when free tissue transfer is required for coverage. We aimed to evaluate factors associated with flap failure in this setting using a large, heterogeneous patient population. METHODS: Retrospective review of patients who underwent traumatic lower extremity free flap reconstruction (2002-2019). Demographics wound/vessel injury characteristics, pre and perioperative factors, and flap outcomes were analyzed. RESULTS: One hundred eighty-eight free flaps met inclusion criteria, with 23 partial (12.2%) and 13 total (6.9%) flap failures. Angiography was performed in 87 patients, with arterial injury suffered in 43.1% of those evaluated. Time to flap coverage varied within 3 days (4.5%), 10 days (17.3%), or 30 days of injury (42.7%). In all, 41 (21.8%) subjects suffered from major flap complications, including failure and takebacks. Multivariate regression demonstrated the presence of posterior tibial (PT) artery injury predictive of both flap-failure (Odds ratio [OR] = 11.4, p < .015) and major flap complications (OR = 12.1, p < .012). Immunocompromised status was also predictive of flap failure (OR = 12.6, p < .004) and major complications (OR = 11.6, p < .007), while achieving flap coverage within 30 days was protective against flap complications (OR = 0.413, p < .049). Defect size, infection, and injury location were not associated with failure. CONCLUSIONS: When examining a large, heterogeneous patient cohort, free flap outcomes in the setting of lower extremity open fractures can be influenced by multiple factors. This presence of PT artery injury, flap coverage beyond 30 days of injury, and immunocompromised status appear predictive of flap complications in this context.

The State of Breast Cancer Reconstruction in Virginia: An Evidence-Based Framework for Identifying Locoregional Health Disparities.

BACKGROUND: Age, race, socioeconomic status, and proximity to plastic surgeons have been shown to impact receipt of reconstruction after mastectomy in several national studies. Given that targeted outreach efforts and programs to address these discrepancies would occur locoregionally, investigation of these reconstructive trends on a state level is warranted. STUDY DESIGN: Patients diagnosed with breast cancer in Virginia between 2000 and 2018 were identified in the Virginia Department of Health Cancer Registry. Patients who underwent mastectomy breast conservation surgery, and/or breast reconstruction at the time of oncologic surgery were identified. Patient demographics were analyzed, and logistic regression analyses were used to determine the likelihood of receipt of mastectomy, receipt of mastectomy versus breast conservation surgery, receipt of mastectomy with reconstruction versus mastectomy alone, and receipt of mastectomy with reconstruction versus breast conservation surgery with respect to the demographic variables. Geographically weighted regression analyses were also performed to determine impact of geographic location on receipt of mastectomy and reconstruction after mastectomy. RESULTS: A total of 78,682 patients in Virginia underwent surgical treatment for breast cancer between 2000 and 2018. Living outside a metropolitan area, increased age, lower socioeconomic status, non-White race, and lower number of plastic surgeons within 50 miles were associated with decreased rates of postmastectomy reconstruction. Rural setting, lower socioeconomic status, and lower plastic surgeon supply were also associated with decreased rates of breast conservation surgery. Reconstruction after mastectomy was lowest in the northwest, central, and southwest regions of Virginia. CONCLUSIONS: Within the state of Virginia, programs to improve access to breast reconstruction for patients residing in rural regions, as well as non-White patients, older patients, and those in lower socioeconomic groups should be implemented. Future studies would implement and study the efficacy of such outreach programs, which could then be applied and tailored to other states or regions to address sociodemographic disparities in access to breast reconstruction.

Long-term Outcomes After Gender-Affirming Surgery: 40-Year Follow-up Study.

BACKGROUND: Gender dysphoria is a condition that often leads to significant patient morbidity and mortality. Although gender-affirming surgery (GAS) has been offered for more than half a century with clear significant short-term improvement in patient well-being, few studies have evaluated the long-term durability of these outcomes. METHODS: Chart review identified 97 patients who were seen for gender dysphoria at a tertiary care center from 1970 to 1990 with comprehensive preoperative evaluations. These evaluations were used to generate a matched follow-up survey regarding their GAS, appearance, and mental/social health for standardized outcome measures. Of 97 patients, 15 agreed to participate in the phone interview and survey. Preoperative and postoperative body congruency score, mental health status, surgical outcomes, and patient satisfaction were compared. RESULTS: Both transmasculine and transfeminine groups were more satisfied with their body postoperatively with significantly less dysphoria. Body congruency score for chest, body hair, and voice improved significantly in 40 years' postoperative settings, with average scores ranging from 84.2 to 96.2. Body congruency scores for genitals ranged from 67.5 to 79 with free flap phalloplasty showing highest scores. Long-term overall body congruency score was 89.6. Improved mental health outcomes persisted following surgery with significantly reduced suicidal ideation and reported resolution of any mental health comorbidity secondary to gender dysphoria. CONCLUSION: Gender-affirming surgery is a durable treatment that improves overall patient well-being. High patient satisfaction, improved dysphoria, and reduced mental health comorbidities persist decades after GAS without any reported patient regret.

Intraoperative Fluorescence Angiography in Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction: Identifying Risk Factors and Outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Intraoperative fluorescence angiography (FA) has been described as a useful adjunct to physical examination in predicting mastectomy skin flap viability for immediate breast reconstruction. Its use has been described as a screening tool for mastectomy skin flap viability as well as a test used only for patients at high risk for mastectomy skin flap loss. We performed a national database review of implant-based breast reconstruction surgeries to determine the practice patterns of FA in this patient cohort and to determine if this technology impacted clinical outcomes. METHODS: A national insurance claims database was reviewed to select patients having undergone direct-to-implant (DTI) and immediate tissue expander (TE) placement with and without intraoperative FA as well as patients who had FA at the time of mastectomy without reconstruction. Patient characteristics that prompted FA and postoperative outcomes with and without FA were evaluated to determine its clinical impact in the observed practice pattern. RESULTS: Of the 48,464 patients identified, 836 had FA. More than twice as many patients undergoing DTI had FA than patients undergoing immediate TE placement (10.4% vs 5%, P < 0.0001). Twelve percent of patients receiving FA at the time of mastectomy had reconstruction delayed. Fluorescence angiography was associated with a trend toward lower overall complication rates in DTI patients (8.0% vs 11.9% without FA) but a significantly higher overall complication rate with immediate TE placement (13.8% vs 10.5% without FA, P = 0.018) and was associated with higher reoperation (12.0% vs 8.3% without FA, P = 0.037) in the TE group. There was no difference in other individual complications, readmission, or explantation for either clinical group with and without FA. Regression analysis identified obesity (odds ratio, 1.32; P < 0.001) and younger age (odds ratio, 1.74; P < 0.001) to be associated with performing FA, whereas obesity, diabetes, and tobacco use were associated with higher complication rates. CONCLUSIONS: Younger and otherwise healthier obese patients were more likely to have FA. A greater proportion of DTI patients had FA than TE patients with improved outcomes in the former group and worse outcomes in the latter group. Obesity, tobacco use, and diabetes were associated with worse outcomes, whereas only obesity was associated with FA use.

A Hundred Years Later, the Legacy of Milton Edgerton, MD, Prevails.

This Viewpoint honors the legacy of a plastic surgeon who was ahead of his time, both in surgical innovations and in the creation of a multidisciplinary clinic for transgender patients.

Prolonged Opioid Use Among Opioid-Naive Women Undergoing Breast Reconstructive Surgery.

Background Patients that undergo mastectomy for breast cancer with reconstruction may be prone to prolonged opioid use. As risk factors are not well-established, this article sought to better understand the risk factors that may be associated with this. Methods Patients that underwent breast reconstruction between 2010 and 2018 were identified in PearlDiver, a national insurance claims database. Patient demographics and comorbidities were elucidated, and various complications were then identified. Descriptive statistics as well as a multivariate analysis was used to evaluate the association of risk factors and complications. Results Breast reconstruction patients of 24,765 were identified from this database. Obesity, tobacco use, benzodiazepine use, and anticonvulsant use were all associated with prolonged opioid prescriptions greater than 90 days after both alloplastic and autologous reconstruction. Conclusion Prolonged opioid use continues to remain a topic of concern, and particularly in cancer patients that undergo breast reconstruction. Providers should be aware of potential risk factors for this to reduce this chance following breast reconstruction surgery.

"Abdominal panniculectomy: Identifying complications and potential risk factors".

BACKGROUND: The abdominal panniculectomy is a common procedure that patients choose to undergo for the purpose of restoring hygiene, reducing infection, and improving personal esthetic. A panniculectomy is often indicated after bariatric surgery, which defines a high-risk patient population. This study sought to better establish the association of known risk factors that can complicate the postoperative care of the panniculectomy patient, and whether or not bariatric surgery plays a role in the development of these complications. METHODS: Patients that underwent a panniculectomy between 2010 and 2018 were identified in PearlDiver, a national insurance-claims database, and identified by CPT code 15,380. Patient demographics and associated medical problems were elucidated, and various complications were then identified. Descriptive statistics as well as a multivariate analysis were used to evaluate the association of risk factors and complications. RESULTS: A total of 8,282 panniculectomy patients were identified. Of these, 1,420 underwent bariatric weight loss surgery prior to their panniculectomy, whereas the remaining 6,869 underwent a panniculectomy alone. Obesity, tobacco use, and diabetes were significant in developing a surgical site infection, wound disruption, and the need to undergo reoperation. Charlson Comorbidity Index greater than one (CCI>1), male gender, age greater than 60, COPD, and HTN identified as potential risk factors in developing various complications. Although patients with prior weight loss surgery had a history significant for prior comorbidities, the overall postoperative complication rate was decreased compared to those who did not undergo preoperative bariatric surgery. CONCLUSION: In the face of the obesity epidemic, the incidence of undergoing a panniculectomy has increased significantly, particularly following bariatric surgery. Identifying potential risk factors in this patient population could better help identify postoperative complications following a panniculectomy and perhaps allow for targeted intervention and medical optimization prior to surgery.

Estimating the Impact of Postamputation Pain.

BACKGROUND: Neuromas, neuralgia, and phantom limb pain commonly occur after lower-extremity amputations; however, incidence of these issues is poorly reported and understood. Present literature is limited to small cohort studies of amputees, and the reported incidence of chronic pain after amputation ranges as widely as 0% to 80%. We sought to objectively investigate the incidence of postamputation pain and nerve-related complications after lower-extremity amputation. METHODS: Patients who underwent lower-extremity amputation between 2007 and 2017 were identified using a national insurance-based claims database. Incidence of reporting of postoperative neuroma, neuralgia, and phantom limb pain were identified. Patient demographics and comorbidities were assessed. Average costs of treatment were determined in the year after lower-extremity amputation. Logistic regression analyses and resulting odds ratios were calculated to determine statistically significant increases in incidence of postamputation nerve-related pain complications in the setting of demographic factors and comorbidities. RESULTS: There were 29,507 lower amputations identified. Postoperative neuralgia occurred in 4.4% of all amputations, neuromas in 0.4%, and phantom limb pain in 10.9%. Nerve-related pain complications were most common in through knee amputations (20.3%) and below knee amputations (16.7%). Male sex, Charlson Comorbidity Index > 3, diabetes mellitus, diabetic neuropathy, diabetic angiopathy, diabetic retinopathy, obesity, peripheral vascular disease, and tobacco abuse were associated with statistically significant increases in incidence of 1-year nerve-related pain or phantom limb pain. CONCLUSIONS: Given the incidence of these complications after operative extremity amputations and associated increased treatment costs, future research regarding their pathophysiology, treatment, and prevention would be beneficial to both patients and providers.

The Optimal Timing of Traumatic Lower Extremity Reconstruction: Current Consensus.

Marko Godina in his landmark paper in 1986 established the principle of early flap coverage for reconstruction of traumatic lower extremity injuries to minimize edema, fibrosis, and infection while optimizing outcomes. However, with the evolution of microsurgery and wound management, there is emerging evidence that timing of reconstruction is not as critical as once believed. Multidisciplinary care with a combined orthopedic and reconstructive approach is more critical for timely and appropriate definite treatment for severe lower extremity injuries.

Management of Gustilo Type IIIC Injuries in the Lower Extremity.

Gustilo IIIC injuries of the lower extremity pose a significant challenge to the reconstructive surgeon. Key principles include early vascular repair and serial debridement followed by definitive coverage within 10 days. Primary reconstructive options following vascular repair include the anterolateral thigh flap or the latissimus dorsi muscle flap. Complications include elevated rates of microvascular thrombosis requiring return to the operating room, partial and complete flap loss, and infection. There is also an elevated rate of secondary amputation. However, in spite of higher complication rates, when approached thoughtfully and with an experienced multidisciplinary team, patients can achieve reasonable functional outcomes.